The numbers make it obvious what the New York Jets’ decision should be regarding Jordan Jenkins.
Edge rusher is once again the prime defensive need for the New York Jets as they head into free agency. While they most certainly have their sights set on marquee targets such as Dante Fowler, the Jets will also have to make a decision on the man who has played more career games for them (60) than any other defensive player on the 2019 roster—Jordan Jenkins.
Jenkins has spurred plenty of debate among the fanbase. Some fans are completely fine with letting him skip town. Others view him as a solid player and hope to see him brought back.
When you turn to the data, it becomes obvious which side is correct.
Sorry, the content stops here if you’re not a Jet X Member, not currently logged-in, or viewing from an outside source such as Google AMP or an RSS Feed where logged-in status is not possible.
Get Started with the button below to access this Jets X-Factor article and the best damn New York Jets content in the world for free (after becoming a member, search for this article near the bottom of the Membership Confirmation page):
Log In with the button below if you’re already a member:
Connect with the button below if you’d like to create a free account first:
Audio Version available to members only: Learn more here
This guy’s analysis suggests Jenkins is better in pass rush than yours based on the amount of double teams he faced…
https://twitter.com/SethWalder/status/1235949932143575040
It’s a really interesting study but I’m not sure how valid it is. Just from watching the film (and Robby or Joe are more versed on this than me) Jenkins absolutely does not get doubled 30% of the time he rushes. It’s also wild to suggest he gets doubled more than true top rushers like Clowney, Armstead, Quinn, Fowler, or Barrett – players who actually would be near the top of an opposing offense’s list of concerns. I think that study confuses “double-team” with simply facing two defenders. The Jets ran a ton of stunts and twists last year (and… Read more »