Zach Wilson, NY Jets, Stats, Film, Contract, Fantasy, PFF Grade, 2021
Zach Wilson, NY Jets, Getty Images

Analyzing the correlation between positional productivity and winning percentage in the NFL

Quarterback is the most important position in football. Just about everyone can agree on that.

Beyond the quarterback position, the totem pole of positional importance in the NFL is subjective and lacks a firmly agreed upon order. There is no perfect consensus on which positions are the most and least important outside of quarterback being king.

I figured it was time to run the numbers and bring some clarity to the topic of positional importance. Which non-quarterback position’s productivity aligns the closest with winning and losing? Which positions do not seem to affect winning and losing as much as the rest?

Using data from all 32 teams in the 2020 regular season, I calculated the correlation between winning percentage and performance quality for every position.

Frankly, the results were extremely surprising. Positions I deemed among the most important had some of the lowest correlations with winning percentages, whereas positions I deemed relatively unimportant ranked near the top of the list.

My perception of positional value has certainly changed a bit after seeing how these numbers came out.

Jets X-Factor Membership
Sorry, the content stops here if you’re not a Jet X Member, not currently logged-in, or viewing from an outside source such as Google AMP or an RSS Feed where logged-in status is not possible.

Get Started with the button below to access this Jets X-Factor article and the best damn New York Jets content in the world for free (after becoming a member, search for this article near the bottom of the Membership Confirmation page):
Jets X-Factor, Get Started
Log In with the button below if you’re already a member:
Jets X-Factor, Log In
Connect with the button below if you’d like to create a free account first:
Jets X-Factor, Connect

Audio Version available to members only: Learn more here

Want More NY Jets News & Jets X-Factor Content?

Download the free Jet X Mobile App to get customizable notifications directly to your iOS (App Store) or Google/Android (Google Play) device.

Add Jets X-Factor to your Google News feed to stay up to date with the New York Jets.

Follow us on Twitter @jetsxfactor for all the latest New York Jets news, Facebook for even more, Instagram for some of the top NY Jets images, and YouTube for original Jets X-Factor videos.

Join the official Jets Discord community to connect with likeminded fans.

Michael Nania is one of the best analytical New York Jets minds in the world, combining his statistical expertise with game film to add proper context to the data. Nania scrapes every corner, ensuring you know all there is to know about everyone from the QB to the long snapper. Nania's Numbers, Nania's QB Grades, and Nania's All-22 give fans a deeper and more well-rounded dive into the Jets than anyone else can offer. Email: michael.nania[at] - Twitter: @Michael_Nania
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

These stats imply two major trends 1) Winning QBs are likely getting the ball out faster thus lessening the impact of the Edge players and stressing the CBs more. Good CBs (likely the man to man types) negate that advantage a bit. Bad CBs get u beat. 2) Good DTs are likely to un-nerve the quick timing QBs more than Edge players – who have further to go to get to the QBs, plus DTs are more likely to affect the running game more. LBs and S are most negatively affected by quick passing and pass happy offenses. It likely underscores the movement to convert S to LBs to get more athletic and better coverage in the back 7.

On balance the team building approach by JD seems generally inline with the trends these stats suggest. As always though, you need to hit on the right players.

Injuries aside, the development of our CBs will likely be most instructive to how this team develops throughout this year.

2 years ago

Nice article, although it’s hard to take too much concrete from it. It would be interesting to see how much this analysis would vary year over year, or maybe how it would look averaged over several years. That might factor out some of the noise from team schedules and certain position groups happening to be correlated with each other in a given year.

2 years ago

Funny because Edge, TE, Guard, and LBer are our weaker positions. If the CBs can surprise along with good play from Wilson we could surprise people this year.

2 years ago
Reply to  revis24_

CB is our weakest position